Population Control Becomes Part of Sustainable Vision for the Future

Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
December 29, 2012

In 2012, the Census Bureau said that they estimated 315.1 million people resided in the US; up from 2.3 million people at the beginning of the year. The Census Bureau went on to say that “”In January 2013, one birth is expected to occur every eight seconds in the United States and one death every 12 seconds.”

0080_bill_gates_forced_sterilizationThe UN Population Fund (UNFPA) a report on the world’s population growth called “State of the World Population 2012” wherein the ideals of family planning were praised as the answer to getting pregnancy “by choice, not by chance.”

The report highlights the ability of developed nations to access abortion procedures as well as the birth-control pill, yet under-developed nations continue to have unintended pregnancies. International agreements and human rights treaties are offered as a solution and even packaged as an insurance of freedom of choice.

Governments like the US and UK scheme to coerce foreign nations to adopt forced sterilization under the guise of foreign aid. India has fallen victim to this eugenics agenda dating back to the 1970s where mass sterilization of this country was first introduced.

In India, an estimated 1 million women are sterilized each year by make-shift medical clinics. The threat of death after having this procedure performed is quite substantial.

Women’s rights advocates are angered by this misappropriation of the sterilization procedure. To simply mass sterilize women for the concentrated agenda of eliminating the Indian population is a violation of women’s rights, say the advocates. There is evidence of quotas to be reached by the sterilization camp directors and bonuses for exceeding those quotas. This reduces this procedure to a business opportunity and not a medical procedure that needs to be handled with respect and care.

According to the RAND Corporation, the push for family planning services has had a tremendous effect on the human population globally. It is in a massive decline that will begin to show itself beginning in an estimated 50 years. Based on the agendas of the UN fertility rates worldwide have fallen in underdeveloped nations and these trends are expected to continue.

Champion eugenicist Melinda Gates, co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), believes she can prevent 40% of people who would otherwise have been born, there by justifying family planning as a scheme to make women healthier who have “families are more successful and their communities are more prosperous.”

The BMGF hosted The London Family Planning Summit (LFPS) back in July of 2012 where they purveyed their depopulation and eugenics agenda in the name of women’s rights.

The BMGF assert that by 2050 “the global population is expected to grow to over 9 billion people” and this is unacceptable to them. By applying pressure to social programs and resources, the BMGF want to use family planning as an investment for all national governments globally.

Delegates at the LFPS will team up with non-governmental organizations like The White Ribbon Alliance for Safe Motherhood (WRA) wherein they have pledged to make sure policies and political leaders are properly swayed in the direction of support their campaign.

Melinda Gates has created a propaganda cartoon where the campaign to sterilize millions of women with Depo-Preovera is celebrated. She also remarked at a TEDxChange conference that Depo-Provera is best because its enables women to receive a shot behind their husbands back. Gates says: “Unfortunately this year a billion couples will have sex with one another . . .” and Gates’ only contention is that sterilization by way of contraception would “give them the right to decide” whether or not to have a child.

Eugenicist Margaret Sanger promoted family planning and was most influential as the co-founder of the American Birth Control League which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and legalizing birth control as part of a landmark US Supreme Court case that removed the Cornstock Act. Sanger also served as president of the International Planned Parenthood Federation.

Planned Parenthood’s Vision 2020 demands governments focus on family planning and reproduction as part of sustainability with commitments that reflect international frameworks. In order to secure an equality of all, Planned Parenthood asserts that the UN Millennium Development Goals must be achieved with respect to controlling human population to ensure that those born are wanted and necessary. In developing nations, Planned Parenthood sees that access to family planning is imperative because controlling those populations is easier than the coercive measures necessary in nations like the US.

With the assistance of private sector corporations, philanthropic foundations (such as the BMGF) and the UN the future consisting of a controlled population is believed to be achievable.

Population stabilization, is the true meaning behind family planning and is evident in the World Bank and UN Population Fund’s push against sovereign nations to reduce their populations by rule of the “global consensus” which dictates human rights policy by deeming some fit to live and others not.

Based on the Rockefeller Commission report, population stabilization is an endeavor worth pursuing, although its success would take decades because of the high incidents of reproduction by marriage. However, with the destruction of the family, this problem could be solved. Furthermore, the stabilization of the global population would reallocate resources to be better spent in terms of quality versus quantity.

Concluding that the best way to achieve population stabilization is to coerce the nation’s citizens that they freely choose abortion and not having a child at all as part of an acceptable societal norm. By way of implementation of social barrier and cultural pressures, the average citizen would rather go with the flow and chose not to procreate for the sake of being part of the herd.

Simultaneously, by reforming the acceptable amount of children born into a married household, the impact of population growth would seem to be natural. And trends would take care of social conformity. Those who had more children would be shunned.

Increasing access to abortion clinics with the inception and popularity of Planned Parenthood would give unacceptable pregnancies a viable solution. This would distract and control another Baby Boom from occurring.

Using images on television, film and print media to control the ideals of the modern family to fit the model of a population stabilized by no longer being plagued with “run-a-way” births; but focusing on the example of small-families as the best way to go.


More on Agenda 21

More on Depopulation

More on New World Order